From Findings to a Plan: How a Neurotherapy (LMNT) Diagnosis Is Built

Overview

A first visit gathers many findings. This guide shows how a therapist turns them into one short statement of what is wrong and one decision about what is done first — the five steps, the order in which findings lead, why digestion comes first, and how the plan is checked and changed.

Four complaints, one picture

A teaching case, put together from many patients: a woman in her late fifties came with a list — painful knees, falling hair, giddiness on standing up, and sugar found recently. A student began four separate plans, one for each item. The senior therapist asked one question that was on none of the lists: how often do her bowels open? The answer was twice a week, with effort, for six years — longer than any complaint on her paper.

Her tongue was coated and several points around the navel were tender. Four complaints turned out to be one picture. The four sheets were turned face down, and a few lines on a single card said what was wrong and what to do first, that same morning. This guide is about how that card gets written.

Four words that must stay apart

After a careful history and examination, a therapist may hold forty pieces of information about one person. A plan is not forty pieces of information. A plan is one sentence about what is wrong, and one decision about what is done first. To get there, four words are kept apart on the card.

• Findings: what was actually observed — a grade at a point, the form of the stool, a value on a report, a sentence in the patient's own words.
• Diagnosis: not a disease name, but which organs are working below their best, in which direction the body has gone (acidic or alkaline), and for how long.
• Plan: what will be done, in order, from today — the first work, the points that are blocked, the diet restrictions (parhez), the days the patient must come, and what will be measured.
• Prescription: the formulas actually given at a session, written in the therapy's own shorthand.

The five steps

Guruji put the method in three plain lines: check the pain points to find which parts of the body are not working at their best; work out logically the root cause of that weakness; then stimulate those organs so that they return to normal working. The aim is not only to relieve the symptom, but to take away the body's tendency to fall ill in that way. In practice this becomes five steps.

• Gather, and connect: the graded pain points around the navel, the vitamin B₁₂ and folic acid points at the hip, the nature of the stool, the menstrual history in women, the full history and any reports that matter.
• Set the direction: the two kidney points on the back, Mu° and Liv°, are compared. Which one is tender tells whether the body has moved towards the acidic or the alkaline side.
• Name the organs, not the diseases: turn the tender points into a plain list of organs working below par.
• Find the one thing underneath: is there a single fault upstream of everything? Usually there is, and usually it is digestion. This is the step students skip.
• Decide the first work and write it down: block the points that must not be given, choose the first work, name what will be measured, and explain it to the patient in words she can repeat at home.

Which finding leads

Often the complaint says “knee” and the examining hand says “stomach”. There is a fixed order of precedence, and it is not a matter of taste. The complaint comes last — not because it does not matter, but because it shows where pain is felt, not where the fault lies. The complaint decides what must finally be fixed; everything above it decides what is fixed first.

• First, the red flag: anything that belongs to a doctor leaves the room before any plan is made.
• Second, the block: a point that must not be given for this patient's condition is struck off before the plan is built. When a block and a recommendation collide, the block wins.
• Third, the digestive fire: where digestion is not sound, it leads, whatever the complaint.
• Fourth, the direction: acidic or alkaline decides which of two opposite families of treatment may be used at all.
• Fifth, the tender side: where the two sides disagree, the tender side gets the work.
• Sixth, the silent finding: a point that does not hurt is also a finding, and it changes the reading of the others.
• Last, the complaint the patient came with.

Digestion first, and the first ten days

Guruji taught that poor digestion — of proteins mainly, and to a lesser degree of fats — lies at the root of illness. Every gland builds its chemicals from the end products of digestion. If digestion runs short, every gland runs short, and whatever was already weakest complains first. So the first treatment corrects digestion, and that alone often brings relief in the present complaint, whatever it is.

A kitchen picture helps patients: one kitchen feeds a hundred houses. If it runs at half strength, every house is short, and the weakest shows it first. Your knee is the weakest house.

That is why, at registration on the very first day, patients are told they must come for the first ten days in a row, without a break, to set the digestive system in order. A course broken on day four is not a shorter course; it is a different one. Many patients notice that, by the end of those ten days, complaints nobody was treating directly have eased too.

Blocking: what must not be given is decided first

In some diseases certain glands already work more than they should. Since this therapy stimulates glands, the therapist must know which points must not be given in which condition. On the first visit, before any treatment, those points are marked off in a box on the diagnosis card. This is called blocking. A block is not a warning attached to a plan; it is the frame the plan is built inside.

Many blocks also name a safer point to use in place of the blocked one, and those substitutions shape what the plan contains. A block is not always for ever: it is needed while the chief symptoms of that disease last. When it is lifted, the date, the reason and the person deciding are written on the card.

What improvement looks like, and when the plan must change

On day one the therapist writes a baseline: hunger, sleep, energy, weakness and the feeling of lightness, each scored out of five, plus the glasses of water drunk yesterday. These small signs usually move first, within a day or two. Relief in small troubles often follows within a few days, and the slower main complaint later. The tender points are re-graded each visit: when the pain at a place eases, its blood supply has returned.

If nothing has moved after a few days, the therapist does not rush to change the treatment. First: was the plan actually carried out — the real days of attendance, the food eaten yesterday, the water? Then a full re-examination, a history asked in a new way, and a fresh check for any red flag. Only then is one thing changed, and it is written down with the date and what is expected.

Key points

• A plan is one sentence about what is wrong and one decision about what is done first — not a list of every finding.
• The diagnosis names the organs working below par and the body's direction, not a disease.
• Several complaints are often one problem with several faces; the commonest root is digestion.
• Red flags go to a doctor first; blocked points are marked before the plan is built.
• The first ten days, without a break, are given to setting the digestion right.
• A written baseline on day one is the only honest way to show later whether anything changed.
• When a plan is not working, check first whether it was carried out, then change one thing at a time.

Topics in this guide

Go deeper

Guruji says

Common questions

Test yourself

Explore more